LPRT 2024-25 Season Recap Part 3: Outside the top 10 Players

Erika Manilla faces a long road ahead to get back into the top 4. Photo 2021 US Open via Kevin Savory

In our last recap article, we’re going to selectively discuss players who didn’t make the top 10 but who are notable, we’ll talk about players who dropped off the tour this year, and opine some at the end.

Notables in the 11-20 range on tour:

– #11 @Samantha Salas Solis missed out on #10 by a scant 3 points and thus misses out on a top 10 spot for the fourth year running. She’s now 38 and is finishing up her 22nd year on tour. She made 2 quarters this year, and can still get wins, and is still Paola’s doubles partner getting titles. How much longer will she tour? We only had 7 events this year, so a once-a-month trip to see old friends isn’t too hard to keep up with.

– @Valeria Centellas and Lexi York finished with almost identical results and points this year, coming in at #12 and #13. Both made all seven events, each made the round of 16 five out of seven times.

– #15 @Stephanie Synhorst made all seven events, made the round of 16 three times, and just out-pointed Carla to finish #15.

– @Carla Munoz finished last year inside the top 10, but missed three of the seven events this year to fall to #16. She’s obviously closer to a top 10 player but just couldn’t hang with the ladies ranked above her missing so much time this season.

– #17 Maria Renee Rodríguez Josey returned to the tour after taking a bit of time away for life, education, etc. She finished #17 with three round of 16 finishes.

– @Michelle Key, who went years without appearing on tour, made four events and just made it into the top 20 this year.

– Former top 10 player @Angela Barrios fell all the way to #21. Barrios is always a tough draw when she does play, whether internationally or professionally, but is like many Bolivian players who struggle financially to make all tour events.

– Naomi Ros, who holds both the USA Racquetball National Adult title and the U21 Junior title right now, finished ranked 22nd.

– @Susana Acosta made it to two events, enough to ensure her 27th season in the rankings.

– Laura Brandt played in two events and finished tied for #28 with a few other ladies, but did so at the age of 57., She became the 3rd oldest player ever to make a round of 16 on tour.

– Two former top 4 players also finished with just enough results to get into the top 30: @Frederique Lambert and Erika Manilla . Lambert’s racquetball career now is mostly limited to Canadian National events, while Manilla’s hip injury has turned out to be far more difficult to recover from than she likely thought. Since exiting the 2024 US Nationals with the injury, she’s played just one LPRT event (in Dec 2024) and then attempted to earn back the US national singles title in May 2025. A healthy Manilla pushes for a top 4 spot on tour, but now she has to work her way all the way back from being ranked well outside the top positions.

– A slew of ladies finished “tied” for #34 with 18.75 points, basically the number of points one earns by making a round of 32 in a singular event. Included in that crew was the @Rhonda Rajsich, who entered her first LPRT pro event in years at the Arizona Open. Also notable in that group is 16U and busy national tournament participant Victoria Rodriguez , former top Mexican Junior @Lucia Gonzalez, and NorCal Outdoor specialist @Erica Williams.

—-

Some notable names who failed to even log an appearance this year:

– Sunshine Arterburn finished #21 last year; zero appearances this year.

– Argentine lefty @martina Katz showed some promise last year in limited appearances and was missing this season.

– Bolivian veterans @Jenny Daza and Yazmine Sabja Aliss missed out on this season. Former top Bolivian junior Michaela Meneses seems like she’s done with the sport.

– Former Junior legend @Adrienne Fisher Haynes didn’t play this season.

– Irish star Aisling Hickey got some surprise results last season but didn’t log an appearance this year.

– No traveling visits from the Ecuadorian Munoz regulars.

– Masiel Rivera has gone from being a top10 threat to no appearances in just a few years.

– Long-time touring pro @Adriana Riveros may ahve finally called it quits.

– Texan @Linda tyler is usually good for an event or two but hasn’t been seen in a while.

Lots of missing Mexican youngsters as well, who normally help fill out these draws and cause some surprises. The tour depth dropped for the 4th year running; we only had 43 distinct players play this season, down from 60+ a few years ago just after covid. A sign of the times.

That’s it for the season! LPRT kicks off with @jim hiser’s big World Singles and Doubles extravaganza in August.

LPRT 2024-25 Season Ending Recap Series part 2: The top 10

Longoria is back on top. Photo via 2019 US Open/Kevin Savory

Hello Racquetball fans. This is part 2 of the LPRT 2024-25 season ending recap series. In Part 1 last week, I loaded up the official year end standings for the tour and did the data entry into the www.proracquetballstats.com database to show the rankings properly in various season-wide reports.

Here, we’re going to review the top 10 ladies of the year. In a fun twist, I’ll also refer back to my recap from last season where I made a far-too-early prediction on this year’s finish. The two reports to have up while reading through this report are the Season Summary Report https://rball.pro/84115e and the Season-ending rankings https://rball.pro/5eca5e .

– #1: Paola Longoria .1521.5 points, 22-5 for the year. 2 titles, 4 finals, 1 semi.

Longoria is back on top after a two year hiatus, She was dominant all year, making every final until the last event (where she already had the title wrapped up). She re-took over #1 on tour in December and didn’t look back. This is her 14th career pro title and at age 35 seems to have settled down after a couple of years of life changes (she got married and got elected to the Mexican congress). I predicted last year she’d either finish #1 or retire; clearly not retiring. Now i’m predicting she stays right where she is; at #1, though not nearly as dominantly as in year’s past.

– #2-T Monserrat Mejia: 1218 points, 18-5 for the year. 2 titles, 1 final, 3 semis.

Amazingly, both Vargas and Mejia finished tied for 2nd on tour with the exact same results and record for the season. The two met four times though, with Mejia winning 3 of the 4, but there’s no tiebreaker here. Mejia’s 5 losses on the season were to Longoria three times, Laime, and Vargas. After dominating the 2022-23 season, she fell to zero titles in 23-24, but rebounds this year with 2 wins, bringing her career total to 8 titles. I predicted she’d stay at #3 last year, but she’s stepped up. I’m predicting she returns to #2 next season.

– #2-T @Maria Jose Vargas : 1218 points, 18-5 for the year. 2 titles, 1 final, 3 semis.

Vargas takes a small step back from her dominant 5-win 23-24 season but stays tied for 2nd. Despite tying for 2nd, Vargas is trending downward, having lost 3 of 4 versus Mejia. I thought she would take the title again last year; now i think she’ll finish 3rd next season.

– #4. Ana Gabriela Martínez 919 points. 15-5 for year. 1 title, 1 final, 3 semis.

Gaby really put it together this season, getting her 3rd career title and finishing 4th, her highest ever season finish. She only missed one event, which really helped keep her ranking high. She managed to go the entire season w/o facing Mejia and gave Longoria two of her losses this season. I predicted last year she’d continue to languish in the 9-10 range on tour, but clearly she’s part of the upper tier of four players right now, each of whom had a title this year. I think she sticks right in the #4 spot next season again unless she misses too many events. The wildcardd for Gaby finishing top4 will be @Erika Manilla ‘s health and Herrera’s attendance.

– #5 @natalia mendez, 528 points, 9-7 for the season. 7 quarters in 7 events

Mendez was a model of consistency this year, never once getting upset in the 16s and earning exactly a quarter final berth in all seven events. This was enough to let her stick at the #7 seed for most of the season, then jumping the next two rivals for #5 at season’s end. I sense though she was lucky not to get an upset-special round of 16 this year and probably finishes closer to #10 next year, as I predicted last y ear.

– #6. @Brenda Laime Jalil 492.5 points. 8-6 for season, 2 semis, 3 qtrs

Laime remains in the #5-#6 range for the third straight year, but did it with a slightly different pathway than in year’s past. Two years ago she was Jeckyl and Hyde, making 3 finals but also losing in the 16s four times. This year she cut down on early upsets (only one upset in the 16s at the NoVa event) and had more consistency. Had she not missed the Arizona Open she may very well have finished 5th. I think she continues to finish right in this spot until she can get more breakthrough wins.

– #7 Kelani Lawrence 487.5 points, 8-7 for season 6 qtrs and one 16s upset

Lawrence had almost an identical season to Mendez, save for one round of 16 upset to Parrilla in the Xmas classic last December. She continues to be a model of consistency on tour, nearly always advancing into the quarters but falling at that Juncture. She has made just one semifinal in her entire career, but the quarters 20 times. Nonetheless, she’s now finished in this 6-7 range for two years in a row and i think she’ll continue to be right here next season.

– #8 @Alexandra Herrera , 451.5 points, 7-5 this season, 2 semis, 3 qtrs, 2 missed

Herrera, a mainstay in the top 4 for nearly a decade, missed two events this year that likely cost her enough points to drop from #4 to #8 on tour. Her big rival this year turned out to be Gaby as they met in the 4/5 quarter final spot three times this season. She managed to avoid her doubles partner Mejia, but the two missed events cost her. If she can make all the tournaments, I think she returns to that 4-5 range. however, the #8 spot is a really tough spot to get away from; even if she wins a round of 16 she projects right into the top player on tour, who she’s got wins against but whom has had her number lately. She may be stuck here for a bit.

– #9 Jessica Parrilla , 320.25 points, 6-7 for season, 2 qtrs and 4 round of 16s

There’s a bit of a drop-off from 8 to 9 in the points, defining a bit of separation on tour between the ladies ranked in the 9-11 range versus those ranked in the 6-8 range. Leoni returns to the top 10 after missing out last season, and managed to do it with a couple of solid wins over Lawrence and Laime to earn quarterfinals appearances. She also held off round of 16 upsets to keep this spot. I sense though she may get pushed down a bit going forward, especially in the 9-10 seed spot.

– #10: Cristina Amaya Cassino , 302.5 points, 3-7 for season, 1 qtr

Amaya just pipped Salas for #10 and thus stays in the top 10 for the second season in a row after dropping well out for a few years. This pivot in performance for a lady in her mid 30s is crazy, and well earned for Amaya. Her biggest win of the season was over Munoz in Chicago, which was instrumental in finishing at this spot. Also, kudos and bravo to Amaya for her awesome Racquetball News TV Weekly series: if you’re not following her on Youtube or Facebook you should be.

https://www.facebook.com/racquetballnewstv

————-

Next up, we’ll cover the rest of the tour notables, talk about some trends in the sport and on tour, and talk about what may happen next year.

LPRT 2024-25 Season Ending Recap Series

Gaby wins the season opener in an 11-10 thriller. It was her only win of the season. Photo via Gaby

Hello Racquetball fans! The latest LPRT finished up in late June, with @Paola Longoria winning her 14th career Pro year-end title. As is our custom, we’ll do a few posts to recap the season.

In this post we’ll just put in links to the season-summary resources here at Pro Racquetball Stats, to which we’ve just finished adding the year-end standings. Next we’ll do a recap of the top 10 players, then in the last post we’ll cover the rest of the tour with notables and what not.

—————-

Key Reports that show Interesting Year End Data:

– Year-End Standings in the database: https://rball.pro/67385e

Longoria ended up winning the title by more than 300 points. That’s exactly the number of points earned for a regular season tour event, so one missed event going forward and Vargas or Mejia could catch her going forward. The race between the top 3 is tight.

– All Finals this season: https://rball.pro/adb65d

We had 7 events this season, one fewer than last season. The tour lost the San Antonio and Chesapeake events, picked up the NoVa invitational, but will presumably lose the Glass Door event next season unless the Peters family/Chicago crew can find another site. They’ll pick up World Singes & Doubles and hopefully the US Open in 2026, but are still missing some of the big-money events they had at the beginning of the decade in places like Aguascaliente, Kansas City, Longoria made the finals of 6 of this season’s 7 events, only missing the last tourney where she already had the title sewn up.

– Distinct Winners per season: https://rball.pro/62777f

This season we saw four different winners in seven events, with very even distribution. @Gaby Martinez took the season opener, then the top 3 ladies each won twice this season. It was the consistency of Longoria versus her rivals that propelled her to the top.

– Season Summary report: https://rball.pro/a82149

This is my go-to report to see the best summary information for the entire tour in one place. This shows every player who appeared on the season, their season-ending rank, and they’re ordered # of tourney wins, # of finals, # of semis, etc. I’ve also got their age at the end of the season, their career and seasonal W/L records, etc. Interesting factoid from this report: there were just six distinct players all season who even made a Semi final. That’s amazing.

– Highest Seeds To… Report: https://rball.pro/62ff50

The highest seed to win this year was Gaby as a #9 seed. Twice we saw an #11 seed make their way to the quarters (both times Jessica Parrilla ).

– Draw sizes for the season: https://rball.pro/98d393

The tour was relatively consistent last fall: 23-25 entrants per event. That bumped up a bit this spring to peak at 27 entrants for both AZ and Boston, but fell off in June to a season low 18 players in Charlotte.

– Complete list of Year-end title winners: https://www.proracquetballstats.com/lprt/lprt_year_end_titles.html

This text-page shows Longoria’s 14 titles, now double the next closest player (Michelle Gould).

– LPRT Tour History; https://www.proracquetballstats.com/lprt/lprt_tour_history.html

This is a years-running list of “important events” that have happened on tour. If you see a major event i’m missing by all means let me know and I’ll add it in.

—————–

That’s it for today. Next post we’ll cover the top 10.

Charlie Brumfield; the sport’s first GOAT. 6/9/48 – 6/1/25

RIP Brumfield, the original GOAT.

Charlie Brumfield, the sports first dominant champion, passed away earlier this week on June 1st. He was a few days shy of his 78th birthday.

Brumfield was Racquetball’s first GOAT. He was a top-level Paddleball player in the late 1960s, won the National Paddleball Association’s Open Singles title in both 1969 and 1970, and partnered with fellow San Diego resident Dr. Bud Muehleisen to take the Open Doubles titles in 1968 and 1969.

(see https://npa.paddleball.org/tournaments-2/national-champions/ for the NPA’s list of champions historically).

Soon, like many of his Paddleball colleagues, he pivoted to Racquetball and was a dominant force in Racquetball’s early days. He brought his dominant paddleball control game to Racquetball, but also incorporated the speed that stringed racquets enabled in the sport. Brumfield made the National Racquetball Singles final in both 1969 and 1970, then won it in both 1972 and 1973 during a time that predated any professional tournaments in the sport. He also claimed three Amateur National Doubles titles in the early 1970s before moving completely to the pro game.

(see https://rball.pro/85i for US Nationals singles titlists, https://rball.pro/a2ef0b for US Nationals Amateur Doubles titles).

Pro racquetball really got its start in 1974, and Brumfield was a force early. By the time the 1974-75 season rolled around, Brumfield was the clear #1 on tour. He won the first two Pro Nationals titles (the equivalent of a “Pro Title” in the early days) held in 1975 by competing pro entities IRA and NRC, then won the 1976 DP/Leach Nationals on home soil in San Diego to get his fifth career “National Title” in singles (three pro, two amateur). He topped Marty Hogan in June 1976 for the title, a significant win because it would mark a changing of the guard in the sport. After dominating Hogan for much of 1975 and 1976, Hogan flipped the table and went on a tear in 1976-77 season. Brumfield would win just one more title after his 76 Nationals win as Hogan took the upper hand in their years-long rivalry.

( see https://www.proracquetballstats.com/irt/year_end_titles.html and https://rball.pro/000f20 for a list of all Finals on tour).

Brumfield continue to tour mostly full time for the rest of the decade, but the introduction of power to the game and Brumfield’s rising age led to him retiring from the pro game after the 1980-81 season at the age of 32. He retired with 16 official career pro wins on the NRC/IRA (still good for 11th of all time) and a W/L record of 185-48, good for a W/L percentage of .794, which sits 4th all time in the history of the sport behind just Kane, Marty, and Sudsy.

(see https://rball.pro/96a384 for his Career Pro Summary page, https://rball.pro/d590ca for a ranking of tourney winners, and https://rball.pro/da9ff5 for Career W/L rankings)

Brumfield was also instrumental to the early days of Outdoor Racquetball, and participated in the first two iterations of Outdoor Nationals, giving the event credence and helping to convince his fellow “indoor” pros to play it as well. He won the first two Pro Outdoor singles titles in 1974 and 1975, winning the Doubles title in the inaugural event with Dr. Bud in 74, and losing in the final of 1975 before “retiring” from outdoor pro. Nonetheless, his importance to outdoor earned him a place in the 2nd ever WOR Hall of Fame class.

(see https://rball.pro/91u for Outdoor Nationals historical singles winners, and here https://rball.pro/9fk for Outdoor Nationals historical doubles winners).

Brumfield’s home in San Diego was also home to a custom-built court that resembles a historical archive of the sport. Dubbed the “Pacific Paddleball Association” the club has hosted both racquetball and paddleball competitions for decades. See https://www.pacificpaddleball.com/ for more.

Brumfield’s exploits have earned him multiple Hall of Fame inductions:

– Paddleball: 2014 (3rd ever person inducted)

– USA Racquetball: 1988 (6th ever person inducted)

– USA Lifetime Achievement recognition in 2013

– WOR Outdoor Racquetball: 2013 (2nd ever person inducted)

(see these links for Hall of Fame bios: NPA: https://npa.paddleball.org/npa-info/hall-of-fame/, USAR: https://www.usaracquetball.com/programs/hall-of-fame/inductees/1988 , and WOR: https://www.usaracquetball.com/wor-hall-of-fame-inductees/charlie-brumfield )

During the duration of his early playing career, Brumfield was also attending his hometown University of San Diego, where he earned a BS and a Law degree in 1973. He delayed the start of his career for years after his Law School graduation due to the simple fact that he was out-earning lawyers during his time playing for money on the courts (and, as he noted, it was a lot more fun). He eventually had a long career in the law, retiring as an in-house counsel to a Biotech firm.

Brumfield is known for being an absolute fierce opponent on the court, combining his fitness and skill with a level of physicality that would shock today’s tender, avoidable-seeking players. It was not unusual for players of the mid 1970s to give each other elbows mid-rally, or to hip-check a player out of the way. Brumfield and Hogan’s matches were legendary, as were his matches against other colorful contemporaries of the day. By the time yours truly got a chance to meet him, he was retired, gregarious, hilarious, and could spin yarn about the sport for hours on end. I enjoyed a couple of dinners with Brum in the last few years at 3WB in Vegas, and I’m completely grateful to have had the opportunity to meet him and talk to him.

RIP Brumfield; you will be missed.

Sudsy & Todd Conversations: Is the ball too fast?

Here’s the next in the Todd & Sudsy conversations. Random musings about the speed of the ball, which pivots into MPH radar gun readings, streamability, the squash court, World Games 2022 broadcasts, and other related information.

If you’d like to listen to the conversation, here’s a link to Sudsy’s Spotify podcast.

If you’d like to read the lightly edited transcript, read on.

Sudsy & Todd Conversations – Is the ball too fast?

⏰Fri, 03/21 15:10PM · 16mins

Transcript

Todd Boss

All right, here we go. Well, hello, Mr. Sudsy. It’s been a long time. Do you know what I want to ask you about today?

Sudsy Monchik

I have no idea and I kind of like it because then it’s much more organic I do not know where we’re gonna go with this.

Todd Boss

So the other day, in the midst of doing some commentary about the state of our sport, I had someone pull out for me one of my pet peeves regarding why racquetball is dying. The claim is, and stop me if you’ve heard this before, the claim is that racquetball is dying because the ball goes too fast. Have you heard that one before?

Sudsy Monchik

Sure, I mean, I’m sure we’ve heard most of these the reasons why right? Everybody’s got an answer.

Todd Boss

So when I say that to you as someone who grew up playing in the 90s, I mean, what’s your immediate thought?

Sudsy Monchik

Silly. It’s nonsense. The speed of the ball has nothing to do with it. There’s been so many changes, not just in our sport, in society, in the world, options for kids. In every sport, there’s an evolution in technology or the way it’s played or the athletes. That’s not the reason why.

Todd Boss

Here, I’ll give you some interesting thought points here. When Marty Hogan hit the scene, he was clocked hitting the ball 142 miles an hour in the late 70s, before oversized rackets, before 22 inch rackets, before any of that.

Now I know that you hit the ball 190…

Sudsy Monchik

Well, thank you.

Todd Boss

142 miles an hour for context is about what your run of the mill pros hit the ball at today. I’m not talking about the power players; if I gave you some names of what we would probably call “control players,” that’s about what they hit.

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, I agree. I would agree that a high average speed for sure. As an example, they recently did a women’s speed gun contest, and I think that wasn’t more than 10 miles per hour faster. And I’d say on average today, a lot of top pros outside of some power players are right around there. Yeah, I’d agree with that.

Todd Boss

So in May of 2022, at the Sweet Caroline, they put the players on a radar gun and did three readings each.

– Erika Manilla came in first; her forehands were measured at 125, 127, and 128.

– The next closest was Samantha Salas, 119, 118, 120.

– Vargas and Munoz were right in that same range

– Then there was kind of a gap down to Centellas, Scott, Lawrence, Mendez, who were hitting like the 112, the 113 range.

– Then we also got readings for like Meneses, Longoria, and Parilla. Interestingly, Paola only hit it 107 to 108 at her max speed

Sudsy Monchik

The hardest hitting female is that I’ve ever been on a court with….

Todd Boss

Let me guess, are you married to her?

Sudsy Monchik

I’m not, no. Backhand, yeah, maybe she is. But Maricruz Ortiz [International ladies player from the Costa Rica] hits the ball harder than anyone.

Todd Boss

Oh, yeah, she does put its charge into it.

Okay, so so point is, is that the ball has been going 140, which is harder than any pro female hits today. And it’s harder than probably 20 to 30 miles an hour harder than most, amateurs hit the ball.

Sudsy Monchik

That’s fair

Todd Boss

That’s part of my argument here. You can make the argument that racquetball distinguished itself from paddleball in the late 70s precisely because it had power.

Sudsy Monchik

Sure. Yeah, of course. Yep. It was it was speed. It was faster. It demanded a lot more movement explosive movement. I’ve played them both.

Todd Boss

Yeah, here’s a question. Here’s another trivia question for you.

When, or in what era or what year do you think that USAR membership peaked?

Sudsy Monchik

What year did it peak? Okay. I’m guessing some, am I right to say in the eighties?

Todd Boss

Nope, a little bit later.

Sudsy Monchik

90s?

Todd Boss

90s. early 90s.

Sudsy Monchik

Really? Okay.

Todd Boss

The highest publicized membership figure, and I’m going based on the figures that they put onto their 990 because every year they would say that they have X number of members and X number of people play.

So in 1993, they peaked at 32,000 members. By the way, we have about a tenth of that right now.

Sudsy Monchik

So it peaked at 32,000 members USA Racquetball, and you’re saying today, March 21st, 2025, we have maybe 3,000?

Todd Boss

I think we have 3,000, 3,500 something like that. I don’t have the exact figures and I don’t have access to that information since I left the board,

Next, what year do you think the IRT had its most pro events? What season?

Sudsy Monchik

Ninety-four?

Todd Boss

That’s right. In the 93-94 season you had 19 tier ones in addition to a bunch of satellites You guys were so busy and, I don’t need to tell you this but, you guys were so busy that the rules were in place so that if you missed an event you would get default points commensurate with your average finish in an event.

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, we, that was the first year I won my first pro stop the pro nationals in 94 and yeah I remember it was it was play a final on Sunday, get ready to travel on Tuesday or Wednesday again. I mean it was constant.

Todd Boss

I mentioned all this because it’s all kind of part of the same argument here.

– So the ball was going 140 in the late 70s.

– It’s why the sport exploded and differentiated itself from from from paddle ball.

– In the 80s, it grew, grew, grew.

– We peak in terms of participation and organizationally in the in the early 90s.

By the way, the 22 inch racket was introduced in 95 and codified into the rules in 96.

So basically, the 22 inch racket, the non pressurized balls have been in place since the exact same point when our sport was at its peak.

So here we are in the year 2025. Why do people now claim that the speed of the ball is the reason that we’ve had this inexorable decline in the sport?

[The argument that “speed killed the sport” is essentially claiming that the sport was dying in 1977, before it even got popular]

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, it’s the age of the internet. And I think when you say “people,” you know, who? What people? Just because there’s a few people, and that’s maybe another conversation, but welcome to the internet, right? In Social media, one or two people out of thousands make a claim. And like, all of a sudden, people buy into it that that’s the reason, or this is a potential reason. It’s just a claim. I don’t think there’s a ton of people, but I think there’s definitely some chatter about it.

But in our sport, Todd, sadly, we’re all looking at what are the reasons for the massive decline. The ball being too fast is laughable. But again, I think we’ve seen most of the people out there that think they know the answer. And what we need to do.

I could tell you this, I don’t know the answer. I don’t have the answer today. We can talk about mistakes, maybe that have happened or lack of vision. Sure, we can talk about that. When we were peaking, what was the plan to sustain that peak and sustain those memberships? I think that’s probably another discussion, right?

But you know, being that this is the ball discussion, you know, could we lend to it potentially turning a few players away? Maybe as much as we would lend to, you know, golf, making a new ball or title is making a new ball and telling somebody, Oh, no, you’re gonna hit it too far?

I’m not buying it. I’m out on that. I’m out on that theory.

Todd Boss

I think the ball going too fast also pivots into another topic, and it’s related to the streamability or the viewability, the “televisibility” if that’s a word.

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, no, that’s BS. I disagree with that. In today’s day and age? No. I’ve spoken to major producers about it. Shawn Royster [former pro player who produced racquetball productions for ESPN and who works in the industry] said it: anything can be filmed today. Come on, we can film it. Plenty of technology, plenty of cameras. It is not that at all.

Todd Boss

I get the sense that the only way that most people consume racquetball right now is via Facebook streaming, frankly. The pro tours streaming their matches.

So if you’ve been onsite when the when they [the IRT’s Pablo Fajre or the LPRT’s Jerry Josey] sets up this equipment, they’re basically getting like a $5,000 camera and they’re hanging it kind of center back of the court. And they’re dependent on the local Wi Fi for bandwidth, and they don’t have multiple angles generally, or if they do, it’s just basically, you know, center mid plus right and left side.

And, it’s really difficult for someone to switch between angles in real-time. We’re not talking like an NFL game with a truck out back, and a dozen people like trying to kind of coordinate the experience. Therefore, the way most of us consume the sport is a grainy ball that you can barely see on a TV on a phone or on a computer screen. So I can I can understand why some people make that claim.

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, it’s an excellent point and it’s one of the things that I’ve been saying. If I was to invest or bring the investors in to try to help it, I would create a controlled environment. If I was trying to bring it to the masses, put it out there because the masses are on devices, on social media, on your computers and laptops and streaming.

I would create an optical spectacle for the world to see racquetball, and to do that I can’t rely on a small little local mom and pop club with spotty Wi-Fi and dirty scratched up glass. I would build a court that is catered to what I am going to be pushing out to the viewer. I would not worry about the people or players on site. It would be what is happening inside that court to show the incredible athleticism, power, strength, everything that we see in racquetball

Then I would introduce it, show it that way, and then I would also explain to every other sport and parent with a child and say, “hey, here’s how racquetball can help you, not only in your other sports, but in life.” And then who knows, maybe we have a chance. But we have to create it so that it’s consistent and it’s just an optical spectacle.

Todd Boss

The last time that we really had really well done video was at the World Games in Birmingham. They brought the brought the portable court, put it into a local gym at the University. Then, they brought in for-real professional, like NFL-quality cameras to broadcast. And you can find that that broadcast out there right now.

[note: to go see broadcasts from the 2022 World Games, go to DailyRacquetball’s page on the event:

Direct link to the Men’s final: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7KEz4U3hCc&list=PLaVzJlpz0Eyaf9kS1rCFiZa3–fFnpCLi&t=10s ]

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, it looks fantastic. But again, and I’ll say this to all of us out there that are putting it out there. I don’t care who you are, where you are, just try to put racquetball out there. Obviously, we all have different abilities, capabilities, time, right? If I just go stream at the club it takes time, it takes money. It’s easy to say, and then some people listen to this, right? And they’re like, “Oh, BS, just turn your phone on.”

Yes, I agree with that. You could do that too. That’s doable as well. Maybe the associations are trying to improve streaming, but I would stop catering to the onsite crowds. Those people will always be there. Instead, figure out how to produce something at a minimum quality of The World Games broadcast that you’re talking about.

Todd Boss

Yeah, no, it’s a good point. I certainly get caught up in the commentary of the people that are in our sport. We don’t have to sell them: they’re already sold. They’re engaged, they’re passionate.

Sudsy Monchik

They’ll always be there. I say it all the time. It’s not about us. We will always be there. We are talking like a living eulogy, right? And, you know, we’re all doing the best we can.

Todd Boss

All right, I’ve got one more question for you. You ever watch squash on the Internet?

Sudsy Monchik

I have come across it, so I wouldn’t say I’ve like stopped to watch it for an extended period of time, but of course I’ve seen it, yes.

Todd Boss

So Professional Squash, and I’m going to caveat this by saying that, in case you didn’t know, they are incredibly well funded, both in the US and internationally, so in a lot of ways, this is an apples and orange comparison.

But you know, squash has this space-age purple court that they take around with a white ball. And when you stream it, people make the argument that it’s a lot easier to see that ball on that court. And then they make the inevitable argument that, hey, that’s what racquetball needs. We need a PSA or professional squash association style purple court with white equipment. And that’s going to solve all of our problems.

Sudsy Monchik

Again, that would be part of my plan to build this court that is specifically made for however I’m going to stream it, produce it, and send it out there. I’ve been to that court, the squash court, I was at Grand Central Station, I know the court you’re talking about. My court would have some LED lights, it would take money, right? But again, if we’re swinging for the fences, yeah, we would need to build a court specific for audio and video, absolutely, and you got to just leave it stationary. It was fun to think about the portable court, but let’s try to get back to a stationary court concept.

At this point, we’re just trying to do everything we can to, quite frankly, stay alive, keep the sport relevant, not be the laughingstock on Twitter or X or whatever you want to call it, you know, and it is what it is.

Todd Boss

Very cool. Well, thanks for talking through my pet peeve topic du jour. I’m sure that everyone will listen to this and either vehemently agree or vehemently disagree and tell us why we’re morons. And I look forward to it.

Sudsy Monchik

Thank you, Todd. Talk soon.

Todd Boss

All right, talk to you later.

3WallBall in Las Vegas hits the “Pause” button

Earlier this week, @3Wall Ball owner and operator Mike Coulter (aka MC Vegas on Facebook) announced he was “pausing” the annual 3WallBall outdoor event for 2025 due to the rising costs and current economic climate. The event, which is incredibly expensive to stage to begin with, has seen its projected costs nearly quadruple this spring and Coulter made the understandable decision not to risk personal financial ruin in order to stage the 16th iteration of the event.

Mike has been running major events in Las Vegas for decades, dating back to the old Pro Nationals events that sometimes out-drew the US Open. He’s given more to the sport in terms of time and resources than almost anyone out there, but even he couldn’t pull a rabbit out of his hat this year, and I wonder if we’re seeing the end of an era.

The 3WB team is searching for an alternative venue, likely in Southern California, where courts can be rented instead of constructed, to hold the 2025 version of the event. My bigger worry is the future of the event; once you take an event off the schedule, it’s awfully hard to get it back. Will the STRAT even entertain a return of the event in 2027? Will the staff that supported the event even be there by that time? Will sponsors who skip a year be willing to sign back up after a year away? Will volunteers do the same? All of these issues conspire against events once they’re gone, and its why tournaments in general are dwindling year over year.

In social media in the wake of the event, the tourney directors of another of the sport’s three outdoor majors Geoff Osberg disclosed that three of his primary sponsors for the 2025 Outdoor Nationals event in July have pulled out, putting that event in serious jeopardy as well.

Thus, starkly, are displayed the major issues that tournament directors face in the modern racquetball world, especially for “national” level events that depend on top players to travel from around the country/world and spend money on flights, hotels, and meals for several days, and thus demand a prize purse worthy of their attention and attendance on top of all the other costs that tournaments have (in no particular order, facilities, food, prizes, shirts, labor, permits, etc). Increasing tournament entry fees is met with the typical resistance from long-time players who remember paying $50 for two events in the 1990s and getting 300+ draws and solid prize money. So sponsors are vital to offset costs… but making ROI arguments to sponsors is a tough sell, and generally speaking racquetball tournament sponsors are of the same ilk as national level sponsors: rich guys willing to write a check for charity out of love for the sport. Unfortunately, those guys are dwindling year over year, and we see one event after another drop off the schedule.

This is not a “how do we fix the sport” post, nor is it commentary on the value of tournament/pro events versus grass roots/club play. SFIA’s 2024 survey reports that we still have 900,000 “core” participants who play frequently and another 2.7M casual participants in this country, which pales in comparison to the few thousand actual USAR members who pay for their tournament licenses. Interestingly these two figures are heading in opposite directions; core participation in racquetball is down 9% over the last 3 years, while casual is up 20%. But it’s these “core” participants who buy memberships and who play tournaments and who drive the sport. Which is why we continue to care.

There’s no easy answers here; if there was, we’d be doing them. I suppose this post is just lament for an event i’ve attended multiple times, and to express support for a guy in Coulter who i’ve tried to support the best way I could for years. I hope 3WB finds a 2025 home, and I hope we can return to Vegas somewhere, somehow in the future, with the full support of the community, recognizing that these events are dwindling.

Sudsy & Todd discuss the Youth movement at the IRT Shamrock Shootout

Hello fans. My good friend Sudsy Monchik and I talk racquetball all the time. Maybe not as much lately, but we frequently catch up on important events, the state of the sport, pro tours, USAR, etc etc.

Sudsy suggested, hey, why don’t we frigging tape these conversations? We’re often talking about topics that cut to the heart of where our sport is right now, and we try to mix in stats and opinion from one of the most decorated and involved names in the sport. So lets see if you guys like to listen in to the kinds of stuff we talk about on the regular.

So, here’s the first cut.

You can listen in (the first one was a zoom audio, though we could try saving video for subsequent ones) here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgKwHYFO-Wg

For those of you want to read instead of watch, here’s a transcript (lightly edited for clarity).

Sudsy & Todd discussion –

International Youth movement in Racquetball at the IRT Shamrock Shootout

⏰Tue, 03/18 13:00PM · 24mins

Transcript

Todd Boss

All right, you ready?

Sudsy Monchik

Ready.

Todd Boss

Sudsy, how are you doing?

Sudsy Monchik

Doing good, doing good, Todd. Driving to my real job.

Todd Boss

Yeah, I’m on lunch break for my real job. So this works out for both of us.

Sudsy Monchik

But we both love racquetball so much that we can’t help it

Todd Boss

That’s right. So here’s the context of today’s conversation.

Are we seeing the next generation of pros, and does it matter based on the state of our sport?

For some Background, when I did the recap of last weekend’s Shamrock Shootout, I noted that a ton of U21 or junior world champions were in Chicago competing. Just to run through them really quickly:

– We had reigning U21 champion Joel Alexis Acha

– You had the world U21 semifinalist Trujillo and Barrios.

– You had the USA U21 champion Benjamin Horner.

– You had the reigning U18 champ and Jonathan Flores, who made a huge impact. We’re going to talk about him in a sec.

– You also had the likes of Sendrey, Mendoza and Herrera Jr., who are top junior national players in the U.S.

– You had top Mexicans like Gastelum here

– And, you had a couple of a little bit older recent Junior World champions, former Bolivians now turned Argentinians, Miranda and Garcia.

Well, that’s a lot of U21 players, and many are starting to get real results on tour.

So the question I have for you, Sudsy is this: Is this the next generation of talent on tour?

Sudsy Monchik

I think clearly you just named a bunch of really talented players, but the thing that jumps out at me is that you didn’t name nearly as many Americans. It’s clear that the level of play of these South American and Mexican Central Americans is so much greater right now than what we have to offer, and that’s that’s something that really bugs me. You know that that hurts my soul, but it is what it is.

When you say next generation, I think that’s connected to the age, right? You said 21 but historically we’ve seen that at like 18 and 19 years old, right?

Sudsy Monchik

When players get into their 20s it’s kind of like, ‘well we’re not really seeing much different now,’ so like I’m looking at who’s 17,18,19 and who is out there, traveling to play tournaments. You have to be playing events and you can’t do it in your hometown, home city, or home country.

The first thing I did when I got to Ecuador; I said, ‘let me see the budget you guys have to get out of here and play internationally.’ You have to get out, you have to play other players, you have to deal with other game styles, and you have to experience adversity and uncomfortableness.

There’s no doubt it’s the “next generation” but how would you define “next generation?”

Todd Boss

Well, if you look at the players who have been ranked in the top 10 as of late,

I’ll just run through them quickly. At the end of last season:

– Kane was 43

– Conrado was 29

– Adam Manilla 29

– Sam Murray’s 31

– Rodrigo 28

– Andres Acuna 29

– Jake’s 33

– Natara is 29

– Martel is 32

– Thomas Carter is 28.

These are the players that you see day in and day out reaching the quarters and semis. Where are the young guns?

Even someone who we think is kind of young is Eduardo Portillo, he was 25 at the end of last season and he’s already turned 26. You know, these are not the young kids. These are not 22 year olds flowing through. So the tour has been dominated by players in that are kind of getting old.

That’s what I thought was notable about the total volume of young players in Chicago.

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, it was great. I would counsel the young guys to take advantage of it while they can now, because those older guys and players need to really start considering how they are going to parlay their racquetball career into what’s next, right? Like, is it sustainable for a 33 year old to continue to travel around trying to be a professional racquetball player?

I think it’s turning into a young man’s game. Now that seems a little opposite of what you just said, right? I think that the younger generation certainly need to focus and kind of maximize the time they have now because it goes fast. It doesn’t last a long time.

I think the bigger question is, when do you really start seeing those guys you just mentioned, the mid twenties and up, say, it’s time for me to look at what’s next.

Todd Boss

I think you already see it. We know Montoya has an engineering degree. Same with Javier Mar. They’ve been top players for a while, but full-time.

Sudsy Monchik

But there’s not enough stops right now for them to “tour full time.”

If the IRT is successful the first thing they’re gonna do is release like double digit tour stops If we see that happen then that’s a great start especially for the younger generation but when you say “they don’t tour” I mean how many stops were there last year?

Todd Boss

That’s a good point. There were only six stops last year.

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, I mean, Mark Frank and I, we played more local events.

Todd Boss

No, it’s a good point. Pivoting a little bit, almost every one of these top U21 players we mentioned is from South America. So for them to get to the United States is tough. You lived in Ecuador so you tell me, how long of a flight is it from Buenos Aires or from in or from the middle of Bolivia to get up here so they can even compete?

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, it’s a full day, it’s a full day of travel. You said Argentina; just to get to Miami and then from Miami go wherever, that’s eight or nine hours. From Bolivia, same thing, seven or eight hours. Not to mention, depending on the city you’re from within that South American country, you might have to make a connection. It’s a full day of travel.

I did it from Ecuador for seven years. And we were actually a lot closer where it was easier for me from Ecuador because one of the major airports went right to Miami. That was wheels up, wheels down in about four hours. But within the country, I still had a three hour drive to get to that airport. So it’s a full day.

The biggest benefit that these players have, Todd, is that their governments financially support them.

Now, I don’t know how many people know this: the tour is actually used as a training/practice platform for these players. All these international countries are more interested in the medals at the international events. Pan American Championships, World Championships, Pan Am Games, World Games. That is more valuable to them in the country and they use the tour, both IRT and LPRT, as training mechanisms to prepare them for those.

Todd Boss

What you just said is absolutely consistent with the conversations I’ve had with the previous commissioner, Pablo Fajre. I won’t name names, but a couple of seasons ago, we were looking at the end of the season rankings and it was going to be really close as to who won, right? And there was an international player who was prominently involved in the race, if that person did really well, they could have finished number one.

Pablo told me that, not only did that player have no idea where he stood in the rankings, but he couldn’t have cared less whether he is number one on tour, because of exactly what you just said. His country, his federation, and his priorities were in order, Winning worlds, Winning the Pan Am games, winning PARC, and then winning whatever other regional competition there was. Then if he happened to come up and take home four grand for winning a pro tour event, great. Four grand is the equivalent of like three months wages in Bolivia, which is obviously a lot. But that’s kind of an interesting mindset for people in this country to consider.

Sudsy Monchik

It’s a fact. I mean, you know, me, I played my whole career, it was all about professional titles, right? It was about that. In fact, the era of the Cliff, Sudsy, Ellis, Mannino; We didn’t do the international thing. Rocky was the only one that did it, and he openly admits he did it for the health insurance.

The US open title was less valuable to these countries than a bronze medal at one of the international events, because that’s how their government funds the team, entirely based on results at the international events.

Todd Boss

So that puts a different spin or a different color on why you see international participation in some of these tournaments. Another side note, oftentimes you’ll see a pro event, whether it’s an IRT or an LPRT event, and you’ll see like the entire Guatemala national team there suddenly, right? This weekend in Chicago, you didn’t see a single Guatemalan player there that I can remember. And it’s because their federation chooses to send the team to get practice for an upcoming international.

Sudsy Monchik

Correct, exactly how it works. So when I had the Ecuadorian Racquetball budget, we get a budget at the beginning of the year from the Olympic Committee, and then we pick and choose the events we’re going to go to to use as training platforms. That’s it, period. Yeah. So Guatemala just didn’t choose to fund this one.

Todd Boss

I’m going to ask you a different, more difficult question. If the next generation is predominantly Bolivian and Mexican, how can they flourish if there’s no pro events in Bolivia or Mexico?

Sudsy Monchik

That’s their biggest obstacle. They need to be able to get out. But here’s the thing, Todd, getting out used to be coming to the US or Canada because we were the best. They don’t have to do that now. They can go around South America, Mexico, Central America and deal with better players.

The travel and getting out is what will help them to be more well-rounded to have to deal with being uncomfortable, right? Like take Conrado. Conrado is a rock star superstar in his little country and little city in Bolivia. And like he’s in his comfort zone. But when he gets out and comes out here, it’s very different. So if they don’t have enough travel events (and I do think rumor has it there might be a planned international professional event or not. I don’t know yet, we’ll wait and see. Hopefully the IRT is making that happen), they still will do that internally. So they’ll pick and choose where to go, when to go and how to go.

But still, yeah, I think it’d be great if there were more events. I think it’d be great for the IRT, for the LPRT and they’re working behind the scenes to do that. But who it really hurts is our players, our next generation of players here in the States.

Todd Boss

We talked about our new generation. There were four good examples playing in Chicago. That was Cole Sendry, DJ Mendoza, who were both on the 18U national championship team that played in the last worlds. Plus you had U21 champ, reigning champ, Benjamin Horner. And we also had a lesser known player who played in 18Us in high schools this year, Juan Herrera Jr.

No, they’re not the only top juniors that get out and about. There’s other names out there, especially in the NorCal area where you have like Prasad and Chauhan and players like that who are winning junior national titles, but almost never travel.

But, What is their impact? We’re not talking about those American players right now as pushing for top 10 spots. We’re talking about Trujillo, who’s ranked in the top 10. We’re talking about Gastelum and Miranda, who show up and get wins. And then there’s the kid we’re going talk about in a moment, Jonathan Flores, who looks like he might be the next big thing. What’s going on with U.S. juniors here?

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, we’re well behind and I think it started years ago and Todd, I mean, you followed my career, and of course Kane’s results speak for themselves. When you go to international junior tournaments, you have to win gold medals.

Are USA juniors winning gold medals and championships and matches? No they’re not. I think we’re a little bit too much of, “Oh, you’re doing great.” Like kind of mediocrity and like, that’s acceptable. But who’s winning? That’s what I want to see. Who are the gold medalists? Those are the next best players, and those are the players doing everything in their power to be the best they can be or the next best player in the world.

It goes back to, well, what’s their motivation? USA isn’t funding them, right? What if the U S Olympic committee said, “Hey, Cole and DJ, if you guys go win a gold medal at the junior worlds, we’re going to pay you a couple of thousand a month and give you health insurance” for being on team USA, maybe they would be more inclined or have the ability, the resources to do everything in their power to wake up every day with that goal in mind.

Or, maybe they’re doing that anyway and we just have a talent gap right now. Because of the years of these other countries doing it, right?

Todd Boss

Yeah. A hundred percent agree.

All right, one more player I want to talk about is Jonathan Flores, Bolivian, two-time 18U Junior world defending champion. I’m just going to read you a couple, some of his recent exploits. He’s now played a handful of pro events. I’m going to start a year ago in Minneapolis.

– In March of 2024, he flies in, and he plays the Hall of Fame event in Minnesota, loses in 32s to Jake Bredenbeck.

– Two weeks later he enters the Lombard event, beats Jake 5,7, turns around and beats Robbie Collins and then in the 16s takes a game off of Kane before he loses 11-7 in the tiebreaker

We don’t see him again in the states, and he wins Junior Worlds 18U without too much trouble.

He shows back up here a couple weeks ago in Minnesota.

– He beats Javier Mar,

– Then he loses 11-10 to Andree Parrilla in the 16s

– A week later he’s in Chicago he beats Diego Gastelum easily

– then in the 16s he trashes the number four seed Alan Natera 9,6

– He faces Andree Parrilla, beats him 15-4 in the first game and then had the match on his racket and loses another 11-10.

The Parrilla match we just saw was a match that, as I wrote and I think that you believe, he really should won to put himself in the semis.

So, what do you make of Jonathan Flores?

Sudsy Monchik

How old is he?

Todd Boss

He’s just finished his 18 year season so he’s playing in his age 19 year.

Sudsy Monchik

Yeah, so one other time in the history of my career, did I ever look at a player and say, that’s different. And that was about Kane Waselenchuk. It was when Kane was 18 or 9 in Chicago. And Cliff said, “hey, take a look at this kid, what do you see?”

I watched about five points of Kane. And I said, “that’s different. He reminds me of us.” That was my exact quote, Todd. And I’ve never said that about any player in the history of the sport, except Kane.

Today, Flores, from what I see with my eye and experience right now, after a healthy Kane and a healthy Conrrado, is the most talented, best all-around player in the sport, period. Now, does that mean he’s the third ranked player in the world? No. I think that all things being equal, weapons, tools, ability, he’s got it. What I don’t know, does he have a dog in him? Is he a fighter? Is he tenacious? Does he have balls? As far as skill, ability, talent, he’s on a different level. Let’s not forget Daniel, too right? But Daniel just isn’t playing right now.

Once he learns how to play, how to win and close those matches out, He’s the most talented player in the world after the first two guys. I just said, I just don’t know if his DNA is made up to now go put it all together.

Todd Boss

I agree. And, then going back, of course, to the first part of this conversation, he lives in Bolivia. So he’s facing a day long flight every time just to get up here, you know, those flights are not cheap. And is he going to have the same kind of priorities as Moscoso?

Is it more important for Flores to win Pan American Racquetball Championship versus come up here every time there’s a pro event and try to win? I guess it remains to be seen, but what I worry about is exactly what I worry about with all these all these Bolivians. I’ll throw the likes of Garcia and Miranda in there as well, even though they are now represent Argentina.

Sudsy Monchik

Can I represent Poland? I’m going to go represent Poland, playing a tournament. I’m Polish. Filipino too.

Todd Boss

I mean, who was it that Woody Clouse represented in one year? A small country in Africa. Eritrea?

Sudsy Monchik

You’re a better speller and much smarter than me, you tell me.

Todd Boss

Yeah, well anyway, so that’s what I wanted to talk about today. Sudsy, any parting words before you crash your car?

Sudsy Monchik

I think there’s a ton of great talent and players out there. Hopefully, the IRT keeps doing what they need to do. To really showcase these players, you know, and see truly who is or who will be the next best player in the world, because until Kane Waselenchuk hangs up his sneakers, it’s still not close.

So I would love to see what’s next. And I would tell a lot of these young guys that, you know, if that’s what they want, they need to do everything in their power to make sure that they can reach that goal and I know these countries support them. If that’s training and coaching and getting out and playing, do that.

But again, Todd, you and I both know, we don’t know what what they’re made of. It’s easy to “hit a ball, get a ball, see ball,” but like, what are you made of when the dust settles and you know you got to go to a dark place to try to get to that finish line? I’m telling you when I saw Flores, I was watching, you know, one of the top three players in the world in the moment, and he didn’t even win that match so whatever that tells you.

Todd Boss

Sounds good. All right, thanks, Sudsy. Drive safe.

Sudsy Monchik

Thanks, bud.

5th Annual Average Joe’s Tournament Recap

Jake with the double in Jersey. Photo Kevin Savory 2020 USAR national doubles

This past weekend was a fun annual tradition; the racquetball-mad Kelley brothers hosted their 5th annual Average Joe’s Event at their custom built court on their property in New Jersey.

Last year’s event was plagued with issues, when a foot of snow hit the Kelley house and wreaked havoc on the electricity.

So, what happened in 2025? Well, four current or former touring pros showed up on the Kelley’s doorstep, which pushed 2024 champ Sendrey down to be the 5th seed. Your top 8 seeds in singles were: Sebastian Franco, Jake Bredenbeck, Momo Zelada, Sam Bredenbeck, Cole Sendrey, Joe Kelley, Jose Flores, and Kyle Ulliman.

Ulliman fell in the 8/9 game to co-host and 2023 champ Sam Kelley; the rest of the seeds went through unscathed. All four top seeds took care of business in the quarters to face off in the semis. There:

– In the top half, Franco moved past Sam Bredenbeck

– From the bottom half, Jake took care of Momo to give us a 1v2 final.

In the final, Jake took out Franco to claim the singles title.

————

In doubles, Sam & Joe Kelley upset the #2 seeds from Maryland Momo & Franco early, but couldn’t take out two-time defending doubles champ Dylan Pruitt & parter Sendrey from the bottom half, putting the two young guns in the final.

The Bredenbeck’s held serve as the #1 seed, topping the team of Dixon & Flores in the other semi.

In the final, Jake made it a double for the weekend and prevented a 3-peat by Dylan by taking the title with brother Sam.

—–

Event Winner Archive:

Singles:

– 1st Annual in 2021: Joe Kelley over Austin Cunningham

– 2nd Annual 2022: Kyle Ulliman over Victor Migliore

– 3rd Annual 2023: Sam Kelley over Victor Migliore

– 4th Annual 2024: Cole Sendrey over Kyle Ulliman

– 5th Annual 2025: Jake Bredenbeck over Sebastian Franco

Doubles:

– 2021: (no doubles event)

– 2022: (no doubles event)

– 2023: Pruitt/Bleyer

– 2024: Pruitt/Cunningham

– 2025: Bredenbeck/Bredenbeck

That’s it for the 2025 Kelley Invitational.

IRT 2024 Season Recap Part 3: Notables outside top 20 and Commentary

Carson extends his season tournament streak. Photo Portland 2019 via Kevin Savory

In part 3, we’ll talk about the notable players outside the top 20, talk about who’s left the sport or seems to be leaving the sport, and then at the end talk about the recent IRT ownership news and provide some commentary about the state of the sport.

Notable Players outside the top 20 this year:

– #22 @Sam Bredenbeck played the first three events of the year, then opted out of everything after May. His brother continued to tour for the rest of the year. Is Sam done playing the tour? He’s entered 28 tournaments in his career, with 8 round of 16s to his name. Round of 16 money isn’t enough to justify the expenses of touring.

– #23 Rocky Carson showed up for 2 events this year to secure his 29th career season with a tournament played. He’s now 3rd all time in terms of seasons with appearances behind Cliff’s 35 and Ruben’s 32.

– #25 @Jim Douglas played all 6 events, lost in the round of 32 in all six events, but is one of the few to play in every event this year.

– #26 @Jhonatan Flores could be the next big thing coming from Bolivia. He cruised to the 2024 18U junior world title (defending the same title he won in 2023), only dropping two games in the semifinal against Mexico’s Eder Renteria. He popped into the USA to play two events in March, and made a run to the quarters in Lombard with wins over James Black, Jake, and Collins. He took then stretched Kane to a tiebreaker, eventually losing 3, (13), 7. This guy is the real deal … and of course he’s Bolivian so we’ll probably barely see him on tour thanks to financial challenges inherent to the sport.

– #32 Diego Garcia Racquetball , another guy we rarely see in the states but who very well might be one of the best 10-12 players in the sport. His IRT results were lacking this year, but his international results were decent (semis at PARC, qtrs at Worlds).

– #36: @Alejandro Cardona, Mr. WRT, is still playing events and getting results. He played the first three events of the season and still can hit the ball.

– #38: @Daniel De La Rosa , 3-time IRT tour champ, now retired from touring. Despite what he said publicly in October 2024 and despite what his sponsors promised, his pickleball calendar basically crushed his racquetball season. After entering the season-opening Lewis Drug event, DLR wasn’t seen on the IRT again. He made time though to dominate US Nationals, and then cruise to a world title in San Antonio. He also played the team event at 3WB, then hopped a red-eye to make his MLP event in Virginia Beach. But the realities of the pickleball commitments are clear; he’s done playing racquetball on any regular basis. The Pickleball community values having “the racquetball champion” play their sport, so i’m sure he’ll find time to play amateur nationals and major IRF events going forward, but his time on the IRT may be done.

– #45 Gerson Miranda, #47 Hector Barrios, and #55 Sebastian Hernandez are all top-notch junior players who would represent the next generation on tour if they could play it regularly.

– #60: @Coby Iwaasa played one event, another guy who probably could be a top 15-20 player or better if there was the financial incentive to tour.

– #65: @Alvaro Beltran managed to play one event; he played the Lewis Drug and got beat by Lalo in the opener. He’s still a fantastic doubles player and continues to be a force in outdoor, but his singles time may be done except for the occasional drop-in event close to home.

– #77 @Brad Levine played the SoCal Open, and in doing so extended his own personal record of being the oldest known entrant to an IRT event.

—————

2024 saw an entire season pass without appearances from several notable players who have been active, and in some cases highly ranked, in the past few seasons.

– Alejandro Landa has retired as announced and has not appeared.

– Sebastian Franco, a regular tour player in 2022, did not play a single event this year.

– Maryland resident, former top 10 player, and Formula Flow partner @Mario Mercado did not play a single event. His business partner Zelada had one result.

– Carlos Keller Vargas continues to represent Bolivia internationally but did not play a single tour event in 2024.

– Nick Riffel, who is Adam Manilla’s regular outdoor partner and former touring pro; zero results this year.

– Sebastian Fernandez filled in last minute to win a US National title but played no pro events.

– Bobby Horn did not even enter his own event this year, but apparently is training to compete at the Lewis Drug later this month.

– Charlie Pratt’s usual single season appearance at his home town event didn’t sanction this year.

– Nothing from Mexican talents Javier Estrada, Eduardo Garay, Christian Longoria, or Gerardo Franco.

With several top-10 stalwarts now gone, there’s certainly opportunity for the next generation of players to move up, and we’re already seeing that with new players in the top 10 this year.

——-

Thoughts on 2025 and the future of the Men’s Pro Sport.

It’s not really controversial, or even penetrating, to say that the sport is in trouble. The Men’s tour in 2024 had just six stops; Lewis Drug, Minnesota HoF, Shamrock Shootout, SoCal Open, Inland Empire, and the Golden State Open. Only three of these even existed a few years ago.

That means that, just from the 2022/2023 seasons, the IRT has lost:

– Longhorn Open (UT changed its policy on hosting)

– Suivant Consulting/Williams Accounting Atlanta event (has Donald Williams stopped sponsoring events?)

– New York Open (Baer brothers stepped away)

– World Singles & Doubles (coming back in 2025 but probably for last time)

– Capital Classic (IRT co-owner Warigon has stopped sponsoring IRT events)

– Tracktown Open (maybe a one and done for 2023)

– Dovetail/Sarasota Open: Kinkin redirecting funds to support Jrs and USAR

– Rally for our Warriors in Boston (Stuart Solomon has a longer history sponsoring LPRT)

– US Open (USAR financial debacle with then-staff failing the sport and the event)

– John Pelham (more money for charity, less for pros)

That’s an entire TOUR worth of events gone in 2 seasons.

Go back a couple more years and you have former events like Arizona Open, the Lou Bradley, the Valentine Open, the Los Compadres guys in SoCal, an event in St Louis, and event in San Antonio, and the Mercedes Benz sponsored event in Cincinnati. All of these tournament directors and events are gone. Can they be reclaimed?

The 6 events last season is the fewest number of events on tour (skipping the covid-related 2021) since the tour collapsed in 1988-1989. They were able to recover then; can they now? In both cases new ownership took over; this time its Keith Minor, who has brought along the financially-connected Negrete, the motivated Manilla, and a big checkbook to hopefully rebuild relationships with the 15 or so tournament directors who have left the sport in the last few years.

Also, nowhere on this list is a single event outside the United States. The tour is dominated by Mexicans; when was the last time an IRT stop was held in Mexico? The answer? 2011. LPRT has had stops in Mexico pretty regularly but nothing for IRT. The WRT came and went, holding dozens of Mexico based events and driving a huge following in the country, and then the IRT literally hires the WRT founder … and still no Mexican events. It’s just as bad for Canada: last pro stop north of the border was in 2008 despite a Canadian national winning a dozen titles since then. We managed to put one event in Bolivia, that sport-crazed country, in 2019 … but nothing since. On the one hand, yes I understand the financials and exchange rates. But on the other hand … where the hell are the sponsors in these countries? Racquetball is crazy popular in both countries, but there’s nobody who can get a pro stop funded??

2024 Junior Worlds showed the Mexican/Bolivian dominance in the sport pretty well: 29 of the 30 titles were won by Mexican or Bolivian players/teams, yet those two countries never host pro events, and as a result their top players struggle to compete on the established pro tour of the sport. I’d really like to see how U21 winner Acha or U18 winner Flores would fare if touring regularly; instead we may get one or two annual trips from them and probably a seeding in the 30s and a brutal round of 16 loss with almost no prize money to dissuade them from coming back.

The tour is likely going to be won by a 44 yr old next year, with a slew of 29-yr old players populating the rest of the top 10. Where’s the next generation of players who will take the mangle? Can a 22yr old like Erick Trujillo step up, or will we see a 50-yr old Kane still winning titles in the year 2030?

I’m hoping to see a more robust tour schedule for 2025; we’ve already seen a slew of new event announcements, which is a good sign. My conversations with Keith indicate we may literally double the stops in 2025 from 2024 (fingers crossed), but certainly we’re in a better place than we were on tour late last year. The new group has some new ideas, and that might bring a spark to the sport.

Best of luck to Minor and the new team, and I can’t wait for the first event of 2025.

IRT 2024 Season Recap Part 2: Players ranked 11-20

Alonso was one of the biggest stories of the year. Photo via Alonso Twitter page

We went through the top 10 in part 1. Lets talk about the guys who finished 11-20, which include a combination of grinders, former top 10 players who missed time, guys on their way out, and guys on their way in.

We start with the #12 ranked player b/c there was a tie for 10th on tour, so technically our first post had one additional player reviewed.

– 12: @Jordy Alonso . One of the biggest stories of the season was the run Alonso made at the SoCal Open in May (see https://rball.pro/pno for the match report. As the #30 seed, he won a round of 64 against Mexican Alejandro Bear, then gave Kane Waselenchuk his earliest career loss in the 32s, beating him in the breaker 11-1. He didn’t stop there, then topping Collins, Martell, and Montoya to make the final before falling to Moscoso. Making the final as a #30 seed was the second highest seed in the history of the sport behind only Kane’s return from his 2-year suspension as a #39 seed making a final. He continued getting success the rest of the way and nearly powered into the top 10. Alonso is not a flash in the pan; he had gotten signature wins before, whether it was on the IRT or it was in Mexican Nationals, but has rarely played on tour over the years.

Outlook for 2025: if he plays full time, he’s got the talent to finish deep in the top 10. I think he’s better than the guys who all finished in the 6-11 range, and could push deep into the top 10 with some results. Prediction for 2025: #7

13. Carlos Ramírez ; the Torreon, Mexico native quietly has played nearly every event on tour over the last two years, becoming a constant presence in the main draws, and for his troubles earned enough points to finish #13 on tour. He’s never advanced past the round of 16 in his career; his best result on tour probably was a tie-breaker loss to Carrasco at the 2024 Minnesota event.

Outlook for 2025: Ramirez is a regular on tour, and regularly gets to the 16s. That means he’s bound to finish in the 13-16 range; i’ll guess he gets pushed down a couple of slots and finishes in the 15-16 range in 2025. Prediction: #16

14. @javier Mar; Mar had his typical IRT season: played about half the events, got a couple of solid results (made a semi in Pleasanton), upset a couple of top-10 players (Jake, Acuna) had a couple of early round battles that didn’t go his way (round of 32 losses to Carson, Trujillo), and showed well on the doubles court (won a title in Pleasanton and finished #6). He can really shock the field (in 2022’s Capital Classic he beat, in order Roland Keller, Garay, Parrilla, Jake, and Murray to make a final). He struggled with a core injury that limited his singles play for months, and has a career that prevents him from committing to the tour full time.

Outlook for 2025: I’ve always been a fan of Mar, ever since watching him stare Kane down at the 2018 US Open and play him as tough as anyone had played him, losing 12,10 to a guy who owned the tour at the time. But Mar has had trouble replicating those results on the regular. It seems like this is who he is: a guy who makes about half the events, can get a run going, but just doesn’t play enough to crack the top 10. Prediction for 2025: #15

15. Eduardo Portillo Rendon : After four straight season in the top 10, including some significant wins and a title in 2022, Lalo missed four of the six events this season while doing flight training, studying to become a pilot. If he plays the tour regularly, he’s a top 6-8 player easily. But his schedule is an unknown; it may be very difficult for him to commit to a 4-day weekend to play a tour event while being low-man on the pilot totem pole call sheet.

Prognosis for 2025: I’m going to assume he’s missing a big chunk of the season again, playing when he can, and thus will be limited in what he can accomplish. I’ll guess #13 for next year.

16. @Robby Collins continues to chug along on tour, playing all six events, making four round of 16s but taking a couple of early losses. This has been his pattern over the past three season and seems likely to continue. He’s a veteran player who’s a tough out for a lot of his typical round of 32 opponents, but a long shot to advance past a top8 player.

Outlook for 2025: the new US Junior national team coach and sometimes-partner to Horn and Manilla in their organizational exploits seems set to continue touring regularly, so a 16-18 finish seems likely once again. Prediction: #17.

17. Diego Gastelum comes in at #17 and along with Trujillo represents the next generation of top players in this sport. Trujillo, Gastelum, Acha, Sebastian Hernandez, and Jhonatan Flores are all in the 18U/21U circle and are of similar talent levels, and they seem set to follow in Trujillo’s footsteps to try to make noise in the sport. We havn’t seen a ton from some of these players yet domestically (cost and visa issues), but some we have, including Gastelum. He beat this year’s U21 world champ Acha at worlds last year, and has some back and forth results with Trujillo in both juniors and adult events.

Prognosis for 2025: I sense Gastelum will continue to tour regularly, and I favor him to make a bunch of 16s. I can see him incrementally jumping up the ranks. I’d love to see him h2h against players like Natera or Carter or Collins to see where he rates. Prediction: #14

18. @Samuel Murray . Murray showed up at the season opener and won it for his second career tier 1 title… then he missed the rest of the pro season. He continued to play for Canada and Internationally, but not on the pro tour. Right now, he represents a first for the sport; he won his last event and may actually be retired. If this is the case, he walks off Pete Sampras style with a win, and may end up breaking a bunch of my reports that all assume players lost their last match.

Outlook for 2025: is he retired? Seems like it. He’s now 31 and is in kind of the same boat as Jake Bredenbeck: he’s a power-guy who’s aging and spent most of his 2023 season struggling to make the quarters on tour. He’s got a good thing going in Canada though, where he hasn’t relinquished the National title in a decade and thus guarantees an influx of money from the association for a while. Still, I have to think he’ll sneak across the boarder for the Lewis and Minnesota events and may get some results. I’ll go #20 next year.

19. @Kadim Carrasco continues to do what he’s done for the past few season: plays most of the events, sometimes gets to the round of 16, never beyond. In 33 career pro events he’s never gotten to the quarters. But, he has had decent success on the doubles court with Moscoso and can hold his own on the forehand side.

Outlook for 2025: more of the same; at age 36 he’s still solid and apparently likes the travel, so I’ll guess he finishes in the 19-20 range again. Prediction: #19

20. Cole Sendry. one of the top USA juniors has been a traveling man this year, flying all over the country to play pro-stops and top events. He’s shown some solid progression, with a win at the Kelley Brother’s event, and he’s gotten some decent IRT results, generally winning when he should have . His IRT losses this year were mostly understandable (Carter, Cuevas, Jake, Parrilla, Portillo). He made two round of 16s, lost in the 32s the other times.

outlook for 2025: clearly he’s actively touring, so I’d expect him to rack up points similarly to the way Carlos Ramirez does. I’d like to see him get some wins against the likes of Cuevas and Ramirez, but his seeding often has him playing a tougher opponent in the 32s. Still, playing all the events and getting wins guarantees a top 20 finish these days. Prediction: #18

Stay tuned for part 3.